Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Kunze
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN HILL, Justice (Assigned).
In this product liability case, Sears, Roebuck & Company and Emerson Electric Company appeal from a $2.5 million plus judgment in favor of Robert E. Kunze that was entered based upon the verdict of a jury. The appellants present eight issues in which they contend that: (1) the jury’s refusal to find that the 10-inch radial arm saw that Kunze was using when he amputated several fingers was unreasonably dangerous as designed fatally conflicts with the jury’s finding that the saw was negligently designed; (2) the jury’s refusal to find that the saw was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. v. ArmstrongTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- HCRA of Texas, Inc. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Woodlands Land Development Co. v. Jenkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
- Allen v. W.A. Virnau & Sons, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.