Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Kunze

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided October 7, 1999No. 09-97-189 CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN HILL, Justice (Assigned).

In this product liability case, Sears, Roebuck & Company and Emerson Electric Company appeal from a $2.5 million plus judgment in favor of Robert E. Kunze that was entered based upon the verdict of a jury. The appellants present eight issues in which they contend that: (1) the jury’s refusal to find that the 10-inch radial arm saw that Kunze was using when he amputated several fingers was unreasonably dangerous as designed fatally conflicts with the jury’s finding that the saw was negligently designed; (2) the jury’s refusal to find that the saw was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. v. ArmstrongTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. HCRA of Texas, Inc. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Woodlands Land Development Co. v. Jenkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
  5. Allen v. W.A. Virnau & Sons, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API