Legal Opinion

Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. v. Armstrong

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2004No. 01-0030PublishedCited by 348 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HECHT, Justice OWEN, Justice JEFFERSON, Justice SMITH, and Justice WAINWRIGHT joined.

In this products liability case, the trial court erroneously admitted hundreds of reports of alleged accidents, almost all of which were hearsay and almost none of which were shown to involve defects like those alleged here. As the plaintiffs evidence and arguments at trial focused on the quantity of other accidents rather than the quality of the evidence regarding her own, we discount her new position on appeal that the improper admission of evidence of other…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by348 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bay Area Healthcare Group, Ltd. v. McShaneTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. LedesmaTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. InmanTexas Supreme Court · 2008

343 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API