Legal Opinion

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co. v. Heyda

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1951No. 14355_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

Henry Heyda on August 16, 1950, at about 7:20 o’clock a. m., while driving his automobile southerly on Scott Street in the city of Shakopee, Minnesota, on his way from work, had the misfortune to collide with an eastbound passenger train of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company at the point where its main line track crosses the street at grade. Heyda was injured and his automobile was damaged. Attributing the accident to the negligence of the Railway Company, he brought this action for damages, asserting: (1) that the speed of the train was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Rintala v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Turner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Dahlquist v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago and North Western Railway Company v. Lillian R. Strand, as Trustee for the Heirs of Roy B. Strand, DecedentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Zontelli Bros.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API