Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Langmuir

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 2, 1925No. 237PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff filed a bill in equity under Rev. St. § 4915, (Comp. St. § 9460), to procure an adjudication that they were entitled to receive a patent, which they had been denied by proceedings in the Patent Office terminating in a decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. They alleged that Armstrong was the inventor of an invention described in an application filed in the Office, which he had assigned to the Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Company; that in the progress of that application through the Office his claim had been put into interference…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. Garfield v. Western Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  3. Kelley v. T. L. Smith Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  4. Southern Pac. Co. v. Arlington Heights Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  5. Mahr v. Union Pac. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1905

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davis v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. Coe v. Hobart Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Hazeltine Corporation v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. Wilson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  5. Montgomery v. East Ridgelawn CemeteryNew York Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API