Legal Opinion

Mahr v. Union Pac. R. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington

Decided July 1, 1905No. 232PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On Motion by Defendant to Quash the Service, and Motion by Plaintiff for Default.

1Opinion of the Court

WHITSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained upon the railroad of defendant in the state of Wyoming, while en route from Denver to Walla Walla, in pursuance of an agreement with the defendant to transport him, his household furniture, and domestic animals to the last-named place. Service was made upon one Robert Burns, the general agent of the Oregon Railway & Navigation Company at Walla Walla. On March 10th the defendant moved to quash the service of summons. Plaintiff contends that by paragraph 3 of said motion the defendant made…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Lincoln v. PowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GrimmSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Armstrong v. LangmuirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. McLean v. McLeanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hill v. BartonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Southern Pac. Co. v. Arlington Heights Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API