Legal Opinion
Cottiero v. Ifkovic
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 30, 1994No. 12997PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant Chemical Bank appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly determined that its mortgage was not entitled to priority over the plaintiffs’ mortgage because (1) the defendant is entitled to equitable subrogation, (2) the plaintiffs were unjustly enriched, (3) the plaintiffs’ mortgage secured an antecedent debt, and (4) the plaintiffs received their mortgage after the grantor had conveyed the deed to the land to the defendant Donald W. Ifkovic, Jr. We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Burns v. KoellmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Providence Electric Co. v. Sutton Place, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Franks v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Board of Tax Review of FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Family Financial Services, Inc. v. SpencerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Biller Associates v. Rte. 156 Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Tuxis-Ohr's, Inc. v. GherloneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Cottiero v. IfkovicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.