Ezell Armour v. The State of Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
925 F.2d 987
Ezell ARMOUR, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The STATE OF OHIO, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-4040.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Reargued Dec. 5, 1990.
Decided Feb. 15, 1991.
Percy Squire (argued), Bricker & Eckler, Columbus, Ohio, Robert A. Douglas, Sr., Youngstown, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants Ezell Armour, Isadore Blakeny and Abdullah Mustafi Ali.
Theresa Rittinger Schaefer, Catherine M. Cola and Andrew I. Sutter (argued), Asst. Attys. Gen., Office of Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, for defendants-appellees State of Ohio, Ohio Apportionment Bd.,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Kennedy; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Norris.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.