Legal Opinion

Price v. Olds

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Crawford District Court. Proceedings under Article 13 of the Justice’s act, cli. 81, Gen. Stat., to recover the possession of 160 acres of land, to which plaintiff Price claimed the right of possession.

Read the full summary

Error from Crawford District Court. Proceedings under Article 13 of the Justice’s act, cli. 81, Gen. Stat., to recover the possession of 160 acres of land, to which plaintiff Price claimed the right of possession. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace, and the complaint, after the caption and the title, alleged— ■ “That the said Olds did within two months last past unlawfully and forcibly enter, and has ever since and does still unlawfully and forcibly and with strong hand detain from the possession of this plaintiff the following premises, (describing them.) The undersigned…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action of forcible entry and detainer. The plaintiff commenced the action before a justice of the peace. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed to the district court. The case was there tried on an agreed statement of facts, and judgment was there rendered against the plaintiff and for the defendant. To reverse this judgment the plaintiff now brings the case to this court.

The agreed statement of facts showed that James E. Joy was the original owner of the land in controversy, holding *74the same by patent…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Black v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Conaway v. GoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Link v. SchlegelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Northcutt v. BastableSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Laughlin v. FarissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API