Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Fariss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the District Court of Oklahoma County j before Henry W. Scott, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tlie court by

Keaton, J.:

Two of the assignments of error alleged in this case are based upon the action of the trial court in overruling a demurrer to the amended petition of defendant in error, (plaintiff below,) which said petition, omitting the caption, is as follows:

“The plaintiff, William D. Fariss, by leave of court, amends his petition, and for cause of action against the defendant, John Laughlin, avers that plaintiff is the owner in fee simple of the following described real estate, to-wit: Lots 17 and-18 and the east half of the southwest quarter of section 5, in township…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lacassagne v. ChapuisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Woodruff v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. Sproat v. DurlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  4. Conaway v. GoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Duffey v. RaffertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Black v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Amsden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Cope v. BradenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  4. Sorrels v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Rowsey v. JamesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API