Legal Opinion

Berneau v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1963No. 3140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

We are again asked to pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence introduced to sustain a conviction of soliciting for lewd and immoral purposes. 1 Appellant urges that the evidence introduced by the government to corroborate the testimony of the arresting officer was insufficient under the Kelly case, 2 and that the trial court erred in not granting his motion for judgment of acquittal.

The evidence may be summarized as follows: A police officer assigned to the Morals Division testified that while driving in an automobile he noticed appellant, dressed in female attire,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Alexander v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Goodsaid v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. United States v. MosesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Wajer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API