Legal Opinion
Goodsaid v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1963No. 3064PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
Appellant was found guilty under Code 1961, 22-1112(a), of making an indecent sexual proposal. He contends here that there was lacking the corroboration necessary to sustain a conviction for this type of offense.
The testimony of the complaining witness was that she hailed appellant’s taxicab in the downtown area and directed him to go to Walter Reed Hospital and that during the trip he engaged her in a conversation and made the indecent proposals complained of. According to appellant’s manifest, admitted in evidence, the duration of the trip was fifteen minutes. When the cab…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Ewing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Ernesto Guarro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Kidwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- District of Columbia v. GarciaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Wajer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Berneau v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Haynes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964