Legal Opinion

People v. Carothers

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1946No. Crim. 4046PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree after trial before a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent) and pursuant to the rules set forth in People v. Pianezzi, 42 Cal.App.2d 265, 269 [108 P.2d 732], the essential facts are:

Defendant occupied, with his wife, a small sleeping apartment in a court containing several other houses. On the evening of December 21, 1945, defendant and Mr. White, an occupant of another dwelling in the court,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. AmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. DrosteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. People v. MeichtryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API