Legal Opinion

Chernaik v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 9, 2019No. A159826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

*586Plaintiffs1 sued defendants the State of Oregon and Governor Kate Brown2 (collectively, the state) for declaratory and equitable relief related to the state's alleged failure to take sufficient steps to protect the state's *28public-trust resources from the effects of climate change. This case is before us for a second time. In the first appeal, we reversed the trial court's dismissal of the case on justiciability grounds and remanded for the trial court to determine whether plaintiffs were entitled to declarations that the atmosphere and other natural resources are trust resources that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Ppl Montana, LLC v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chernaik v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Akles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State ex rel. Hoyle v. City of Grants PassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API