Legal Opinion

Ppl Montana, LLC v. Montana

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 22, 2012No. 10-218PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

This case concerns three rivers which flow through Montana and then beyond its borders. The question is whether discrete, identifiable segments of these rivers in Montana were nonnavigable, as federal law defines that concept for purposes of determining whether the State acquired title to the riverbeds underlying those segments, when the State entered the Union in 1889. Montana contends that the rivers must be found navigable at the disputed locations. From this premise, the State asserts that in 1889 it gained title to the disputed riverbeds under the constitutional equal-footing doctrine.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Roc Sansotta v. Town of Nags HeadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Sturgeon v. FrostSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Albert v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Randall Pavlock v. Eric HolcombCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API