Legal Opinion
Mount v. Department of Consumer & Business Services
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 8, 2002No. 97-08823; A103636Published
1Opinion of the Court
46 P.3d 210 (2002)
181 Or. App. 458
In the Matter of the Compensation of Cindy M. Mount, Claimant.
Cindy M. MOUNT, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.
97-08823; A103636.
Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.
Submitted on Remand November 26, 2001;
Resubmitted February 6, 2002.
Decided May 8, 2002.
Christopher D. Moore, Eugene, and Malagon, Moore & Jensen for petitioner.
David L. Runner, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
Before DEITS, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, LANDAU, HASELTON, ARMSTRONG, LINDER, WOLLHEIM, KISTLER, BREWER, and…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Fister v. South Hills Health CareCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Trujillo v. Pacific Safety SupplyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Logsdon v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.