Legal Opinion

Berenholz v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 23, 1982No. 61-78PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLAIANNI, Judge:

Plaintiffs in this action are owners of a parcel of land situated adjacent to Lake Erie in Monroe County, Michigan, just north of the village of Estral Beach, Michigan. Plaintiffs seek to recover for the loss of their land due to erosion and flooding allegedly caused by defendant’s actions. Defendant, through the Army Corps of Engineers, removed a 35-ft. section of the dike protecting plaintiffs’ property from Lake Erie in order to transport equipment across plaintiffs’ land to effect emergency repairs on a dike protecting the north border of the village of Estral…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District No. OneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Johns-Manville Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Foster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Laughlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API