Legal Opinion
Saylor v. Lindsley
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 18, 1976No. 65 Civ. 516 (CHT)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendants Falconbridge Nickel Mines Limited (“Falconbridge”), La Luz Mines Limited (“La Luz”), and Ventures Limited (“Ventures”) seek an order of this Court dismissing the complaint in this action as to each of them. The motions are based upon: (1) Rules 4(a) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the plaintiffs’ more than seven year delay in prosecuting the action against each of the moving defendants; and (2) Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon the ground that if a claim is stated in the complaint it is barred by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Herbert E. Theilmann, Administrator of Herbert K. Theilmann v. The Rutland Hospital, Inc., and Dr. Donald D. DingmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Arra Ray Messenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Kurt Von Poppenheim v. Portland Boxing & Wrestling CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crysen/Montenay Energy Co. v. E & C Trading Ltd. (In Re Crysen/Montenay Energy Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Saylor v. BastedoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Saylor v. BastedoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Europacific Asset Management Corp. v. Tradescape, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Everest Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.