Legal Opinion
Kurt Von Poppenheim v. Portland Boxing & Wrestling Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1971No. 23846_1PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDBERG, District Judge:
This appeal concerns that portion of Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that authorizes the court to dismiss a plaintiff’s action with prejudice for his failure to comply with an order of the court. The appeal is properly before us pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Plaintiff Kurt von Poppenheim is a professional wrestler from Portland, Oregon. Defendants are the Portland Boxing & Wrestling Commission, the individual members of the Commission, the National Wrestling Alliance, Don Owen, Don Owen Sports, Inc., Mount Hood Radio & Television Broadcasting…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Albert Flaksa v. Little River Marine Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Powell v. Committee on Admissions & Grievances of the United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- McHenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re William EISEN, Debtor. Richard MONEYMAKER, Appellant, v. Melvyn J. CoBEN, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Mchenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.