Legal Opinion

Royal Crown Cola Co. v. Crown Beverage Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 26, 1961No. 60-C-567PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTELS, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Rule 12(c), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A. However, since the plaintiff seeks to incorporate documents other than the complaint and answer herein, its motion will be treated as one for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56. Defendant, while contending that there exist material issues of fact in this case, has nevertheless cross-moved for summary judgment in the event that the Court rejects its contention.1

On May 2, 1957 plaintiff filed two applications (Serial Nos. 29,294 and 29,-296) with the Patent Office…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Avedis Zildjian Co. v. The Fred Gretsch Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. United States of America, as Represented by Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture v. Joseph SzuecsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  4. Consolidated Cosmetics v. Neilson Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1952
  5. R. J. Moran Co. v. Seeck & Kabe, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson Jones Company v. The Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Hunter v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Huntington National Mattress Co. v. Celanese Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  4. Sarah Coventry, Inc. v. T. Sardelli & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
  5. Buitoni Foods Corp. v. Gio. Buton & C. S.P.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API