Legal Opinion

Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 30, 2022No. 1:06-cv-00605Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-MEH (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-STV) Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-MEH CROCS, INC., Plaintiff, v. EFFERVESCENT, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-STV U.S.A. DAWGS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. RONALD SNYDER, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Counterclaim Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Certain Expert Testimony [Docket No. 1026]. Crocs, Inc. (“Crocs”) responded, Docket No. 1059, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Specht v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Rodriguez-FelixCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API