Legal Opinion

James v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 6, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

On appeal from a judgment against him in an automobile negligence case, the defendant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a peremptory instruction, because the plaintiff failed • to prove venue.

The action was brought in Edmonson County. The petition alleged that the accident occurred in Edmonson County. The defendant’s answer consisted only of a general denial. In the proof, there was no specific evidence that the place of the accident was in Edmonson County.

There is no general rule of law requiring that the plaintiff, in his petition, allege facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Pinnacle Motor Company v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fritsch v. CaudillKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Dollar General Stores, Ltd. v. SmithKentucky Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Herrick v. WillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Licking River Limestone Co. v. HeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  5. Stewart v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API