Herrick v. Wills
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Commissioner.
In this action to sell real estate devised under the will of Mary Scott Brooks, it was alleged in the complaint that defendant appellants had forfeited their remainder interests by bringing an earlier suit to contest the will. The will contained a “no contest” clause. The trial court adjudged a forfeiture.
A will contest had been instituted over ten years ago, and as shown by the record of that suit, the present defendants were named as party plaintiffs. By pleading in this action, defendants denied that anyone was authorized to bring the contest suit in their names, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crump v. SabathCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Grigsby v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
- James v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
- Craft v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Hayes v. Berea CollegeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Personnel Board v. HeckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
- Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Montrial Demetrius Johnson v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Service Financial Co. v. WareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.