Legal Opinion

Pinnacle Motor Company v. Simpson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 22, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

-Affirming.

This case is before us on a motion for an appeal. Although we are of opinion that the judgment of the lower court is correct, yet, as this record involves questions of practice of interest to the bar, we have decided to grant the motion for an appeal in order that a written opinion may be delivered.

The appellee brought suit in the Harlan circuit court against the appellant, a corporation, for $260.00 on a contractual claim. The summons was duly served in Harlan county on an agent of the appellant, whom it is not denied was the proper agent for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. Beeler's Admx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Richardson v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henry Fisher Packing Co. v. MattoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. James v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  3. Kaui v. County of KauaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Licking River Limestone Co. v. HeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. City of Pineville v. PartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API