Legal Opinion

In re Bullard's Estate

California Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1892No. 14,902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; E. R. Garber, Judge. Proceeding to contest the will of James H. Bullard, deceased. From an order in favor of contestants, the beneficiary appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to admit a proposed will to probate. The testator, James H. Bullard, died at the age of about seventy-six years, leaving, surviving him, three grown-up sons. His estate consisted of real property in the city and county of San Francisco of the alleged value of $6,000. Eight days before his death he executed the will in question, and by it devised all of his estate to his eldest son, except a nominal legacy of five dollars to each of the other two. The eldest son presented the will for probate, and his brothers contested it upon the grounds,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hidden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Jones v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. San Francisco Savings Union v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Baggs v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Egbert v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Faure v. DrollingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API