San Francisco Savings Union v. Myers
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. Motion to dismiss appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal of the defendant McDonald on the ground that the judgment appealed from was entered “ upon the mutual consent ” of the appellant and the other parties-to the action. In the margin, opposite to the copy of the judgment contained in the transcript, appear the words: “Indorsed in lead pencil on the back of the original judgment is the following: ‘ Agreed to. Pillsbury *162and Blanding, Lewis Shearer, William F. Herrin.’ ” The answer of defendent McDonald is subscribed, “ Wallace, Greathouse, and Blanding,” as his attorneys, for whom, after the entry of the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Vosburg v. VosburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hynes v. BarnesMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re Marriage of HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.