Seltzer v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is from the hearing court’s judgment denying movant’s second Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.
We affirmed movant’s conviction on direct appeal in State v. Seltzer, 655 S.W.2d 75 (Mo.App.1983) and affirmed on May 28, 1985 the denial of movant’s Rule 27.26 motion in Seltzer v. State, 694 S.W.2d 778 (Mo.App.1985). In a Rule 27.26 proceeding our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether the findings, conclusions and judgments of the motion court are clearly erroneous. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 27.26(j) (repealed effective January…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Allen v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.