Allen v. Hardy
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
In 1978, petitioner Earl Allen, a black man, was indicted for murdering his girlfriend and her brother. During selection of the petit jurors at petitioner’s trial, the prosecutor exercised 9 of the State’s 17 peremptory challenges to strike 7 black and 2 Hispanic veniremen. Defense counsel moved to discharge the jury on the ground that the “ ‘State’s use of peremptory challenges undercut [petitioner’s] right to an impartial jury selected from a cross-section of the community by systematically excluding minorities from the petit jury.’” People v. Allen, 96 Ill. App. 3d 871, 875, 422 N. E. 2d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by488 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
483 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.