Legal Opinion

Allen v. Hardy

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 30, 1986No. 85-6593PublishedCited by 488 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1978, petitioner Earl Allen, a black man, was indicted for murdering his girlfriend and her brother. During selection of the petit jurors at petitioner’s trial, the prosecutor exercised 9 of the State’s 17 peremptory challenges to strike 7 black and 2 Hispanic veniremen. Defense counsel moved to discharge the jury on the ground that the “ ‘State’s use of peremptory challenges undercut [petitioner’s] right to an impartial jury selected from a cross-section of the community by systematically excluding minorities from the petit jury.’” People v. Allen, 96 Ill. App. 3d 871, 875, 422 N. E. 2d…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by488 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

483 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API