Legal Opinion

Cravatts v. Klozo Fastener Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Isidor Wasservogel, Special Referee.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act whereby petitioner seeks an order of the court to compel the respondent to permit an inspection of its books and records.

The pleadings merely allege that petitioner, as a director and stockholder of the respondent corporation, made a demand for an examination of its corporate books, which demand was refused. Petitioner’s application was granted at Special Term, Part I, by an order dated September 9, 1953. Upon appeal to the Appellate Division, First Department, this order was unanimously…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Schulman v. Louis Dejonge & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Wilkins v. M. Ascher Silk Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. People Ex Rel. Wilkins v. M. Ascher Silk Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. Garden Hill Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. In re ShortenNew York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API