Legal Opinion

New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co. v. Matzinger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1940No. 27570PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question presented in this case is whether, under the facts before the court, an injunction should issue restraining the defendant from proceeding to trial with her case against the plaintiff, now pending in the Superior Court of Cook county, Illinois.

If the question of jurisdiction of that court were the only issue, that would, of course, be a question for its determination. However, the jurisdiction of that court is not challenged. On the contrary, it is conceded that it has jurisdiction of both the subject-matter and the parties.

It is well settled that a court of equity may restrain a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. SlutzMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Allen v. Chicago Great Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Reeves v. Louisville & Nashville Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Morrison v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. American Motors Corp. v. HuffstutlerOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sil-Flo Corporation v. BowenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Leege v. StrandAlaska Supreme Court · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API