Legal Opinion

Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Slutz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket No. 59, Calendar No. 37,797PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a decree enjoining him from prosecuting an action at law he instituted against plaintiff in Cook county, Illinois, to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been occasioned him in a collision with one of plaintiff’s trains at the city of Benton Harbor, this State, in June, 1932.

Defendant herein, plaintiff in the action at law in the State of Illinois, is a resident of Van Burén county, Michigan, and plaintiff herein is a Michigan corporation, with a line of its railroad traversing Van Burén county, and extending to the city of Chicago, Cook…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Royal League v. KavanaghIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Oates v. Morningside CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Usen v. UsenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  2. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co. v. MatzingerOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Boston & Maine Railroad v. WhiteheadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Hoover Realty v. American Institute of Marketing SystemsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API