Legal Opinion

Central Trust Co. v. Louisville, St. L. & T. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky

Decided October 1, 1895No. Nos. 6,345, 6,346PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Suits by the Central Trust Company against the Louisville, St. Louis & Texas Railway Company for foreclosure of mortgages. Heard on demurrer to intervening petition of Mchols, Watkins & Co., and others.

1Opinion of the Court

BARR, District Judge.

This intervening petition claims that the railway company on the 23d of July, 1892, made a contract with H. M. McCracken, who agreed to procure the necessary right of way for an extension of its line from its terminus at West Point, at a place called Howard, across to a junction with the Louisville & Hashville Railroad,' and also agreed to erect a bridge across Salt river. McCracken was to construct and complete said extension to the Hashville Railroad, and get therefor, from the railroad com-' pany, $25;000 of its first mortgage 6 per cent, bonds, and $25,000 of its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Sweeney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Chicago, Santa Fé & California Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. FenlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. A. Bentley & Sons Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1923
  2. Williams v. Mount Hood Ry. & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Lovell v. PottsOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Massman Construction Co. v. Lake Lotawana Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Penker Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API