Legal Opinion

Van Hee v. Rickman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant to recover damages for the breach of a contract for the sale of real property. The cause being at issue and the parties consenting, a trial was had to the court without a jury. The court made findings and gave judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Defendant owned Lot 1 in Block 80 in the town of Sellwood, now part of the City of Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, and on November 3, 1920, contracted to sell and convey the same to plaintiff. The terms of the agreement between plaintiff and defendant were expressed in a written…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morris v. . WhitcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Caveny v. CurtisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Disbrow v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Sage v. . TruslowNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jensen v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Glisan v. SmolenskeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Continental Life Ins. Co. v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  5. City of Bend v. Title & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API