Legal Opinion

Meekins v. Branning Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided June 30, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Joseph C. Meekins against the Branning Manufacturing Company and another. Bill filed by plaintiff for an accounting of the value of timbér cut from lands of which he alleges defendant, Branning Manufacturing Company, and himself, are tenants in common, heard upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, District Judge.

Plaintiff alleges that'defendant Bran-ning Manufacturing Company and himself are, and have been since August 16, 1894, owners as tenants in common of the land described in his bill; plaintiff being the owner of one half, subject to the life estate of defendant Jeremiah C. Meekins, Jr., and defendant Bran-ning Manufacturing Company, of the other half thereof; that the defendant has cut a large quantity of valuable timber from the land and, although demand has been made, refuses to account therefor. He also avers that defendant company holds a deed executed by Thomas and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Craig v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  2. Benbow v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Foil v. Newsome.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Powell v. . WoodcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Vaughan v. . FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Empire Coal Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. Martin v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Estate of LoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Warrick v. WoodhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Connecticut College for Women v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API