Legal Opinion

Olmstead v. COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1998No. Appeal 0006 M.D. Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 1998, we AFFIRM the Order of the Commonwealth Court on the basis of our Opinion in Sullivan v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, — Pa. -, 708 A.2d 481, and without regard to the issue of whether the New York offense of Driving While Ability Impaired, N.Y. Veh. & Traf. Law § 1192(1), is substantially similar to the Pennsylvania offense of Driving Under the Influence, 75 Pa. C.S. § 3731(a)(1), for purposes of imposing a driver’s license suspension pursuant to the Driver License Compact of 1961.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. COM. DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Petrovick v. COM., DEPT OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Petrovick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. State v. RansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Eck v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Roche v. State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API