Legal Opinion

Roche v. State Employes' Retirement Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Judge.

Joseph A. Roche appeals from the order of the State Employes’ Retirement Board (board) denying his exceptions to the opinion and recommendation of a hearing officer, and ordering the State Employes’ Retirement System (SERS) to implement all sanctions and remedies provided for in the Public Employee Pension Forfeiture Act (Act 140). 1 We reverse.

The facts of this ease may be summarized as follows. On October 17, 1974, Roche became a member of SERS by virtue of his employment with the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (department) at the State Correctional Institution at…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scarantino v. Public School Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Hutchinson v. Pennsylvania State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Brace v. County of LuzerneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Gierschick v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. DiLacqua v. City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions & RetirementCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API