Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Vermillion

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 14, 1951No. 15274PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFRO, Justice.. This is a suit for partition and, accounting. .

In 1920, H. M. Vermillion and wife, Hattie Haynes Vermillion, purchased a lot in Dallas, Texas; they paid $1,500-cash and executed a vendor’s lien note for $3,-000. In December, 1924, they executed a renewal note for a balance of $2,000 due on the purchase money. On February 6, 1929, H. M. Vermillion executed a general warranty deed conveying the land in question to his wife, Hattie Haynes Vermillion, as her separate estate, reciting a consideration of $10 and love and affection. The deed was silent concerning the outstanding…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vermillion v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Shryock & Rowland v. LatimerTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Buchanan v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Crowder Sr. v. Union Nat. BankTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Mays v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Webb v. Reserve Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. In Re StarnsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1985
  3. Webb v. Reserve Life Insurance (In re Webb)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Poenisch v. QuarnstromCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Western Fire Insurance Co. v. Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API