Collier v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This is an action to quiet title and to ¡recover possession of certain real estate. Plaintiff had judgment upon the pleadings and the defendant Johnson [appeals.
The plaintiff’s complaint alleges that on the thirty-first lay of May, 1920, the plaintiff let the defendant Johnson [into the possession of the Oregon Bar mining claim, together with certain improvements thereon, describing the Situation of the claim; that on or about the month of ipril, 1922, the defendant Johnson let one F. W. Edsall |nto possession of said property without the consent of the ilaintiff. Edsall was made a defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McKie v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Jochen v. TibbellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Hambey v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Bertram v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- League v. Buena Ventura Stock Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- San Juan Gold Co. v. San Juan Ridge Mutual Water Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Yuba River Sand Co. v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Woodley v. AllsteadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.