Hambey v. Wise
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County. J. A. Bardin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The facts upon which this appeal is based are stated as follows in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Beasly, sitting pro tempore as a member of the district court of appeal for the first appellate district:
“This action was brought to obtain a decree of specific performance of an oral contract for the conveyance of real property. The record consists of the judgment-roll alone. From the findings it appears that on March 12, 1916, plaintiff entered into an oral agreement with defendant Wise for the purchase of the property in question for the sum of one thousand dollars, and that said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- McKie v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Arguello v. EdingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Jochen v. TibbellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Fulton v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gaglione v. CoolidgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Harrison v. HansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Forbes v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Graves v. Arizona Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Wood v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.