Legal Opinion
United States v. Harold Peter Entringer
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1976No. 75-1767PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Harold Peter Entringer appeals his conviction of one count of using a common carrier to transport obscene material in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462. We affirm.
Most of the facts were stipulated at trial and the rest are not seriously disputed.
On May 8, 1974, a two-package c. o. d. shipment addressed to appellant-Entringer at his residence, Risque Farms, Manchester, Missouri, arrived at the Trans World Airlines offices in St. Louis, Missouri. The shipment was being carried by TWA for Emery Air Freight. Emery is an air freight forwarder and uses commercial air lines to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roaden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Dennis E. PrybaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Richard Alan Haes, D/B/A H & H Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Bertram E. SeidlitzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Ramon Rodriguez and Michael ButtigiegCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Hank JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Angela Luz GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.