Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Cox

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1897No. 7255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Butler county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This was an action to recover the value of a horse alleged to have been fatally injured by one of defendant’s trains. The evidence adduced on the trial disclosed substantially the following facts: In the daytime of March 26, 1892, plaintiff’s horse went upon the defendant’s road about ninety rods south of one of its bridges, and at a point where the law made it the duty of the company to build and maintain a fence on each side of its right of way. At the time an engine and train of cars approached from the south at a high rate of speed, and when within forty or fifty rods from the horse, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knight v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. A. T. & Santa Fé Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. Meeker v. N. P. R. R. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley R. R. v. LambNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. PounderNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Middaugh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Brei v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Gonsenhauser v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API