Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Cox
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Butler county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This was an action to recover the value of a horse alleged to have been fatally injured by one of defendant’s trains. The evidence adduced on the trial disclosed substantially the following facts: In the daytime of March 26, 1892, plaintiff’s horse went upon the defendant’s road about ninety rods south of one of its bridges, and at a point where the law made it the duty of the company to build and maintain a fence on each side of its right of way. At the time an engine and train of cars approached from the south at a high rate of speed, and when within forty or fifty rods from the horse, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knight v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- A. T. & Santa Fé Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Meeker v. N. P. R. R. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley R. R. v. LambNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
- Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. PounderNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Middaugh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1926
- Brei v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Gonsenhauser v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959