Legal Opinion

Meeker v. N. P. R. R. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This was an action brought under section 4044, Hill’s Code, to recover damages for the alleged value of a mare, which had entered upon the railroad track of the defendant company, where the same was unfenced, and while there was driven by a moving train into an open trestle, and so crippled and injured as to be rendered valueless.

The facts tended to show that there were some three or four horses, including the mare, running at large upon a range that entered upon the unfenced track of the defendant’s railroad; that not far behind where the horses entered upon the track was an engine and train…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peru & Indianapolis Railroad v. HasketIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Lafferty v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Knight v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Baltimore, Pittsburgh & Chicago R. W. Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coos Bay Navigation Co. v. EndicottOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Meier v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Mikesell v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gonsenhauser v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API