Legal Opinion

Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley R. R. v. Lamb

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Stanton County.

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The questions presented by tbe records in these two eases are in all respects the same as we have already considered at this term, in tbe case of The Fremont, *593Elkhorn & Missouri R. R. v. Whalen, ante p. 585. The course pursued in the examination of witnesses to> prove damages by reason of the location of the road, and the character of the testimony, were not materially different. The instructions given to the jury in Jhe three cases were identical. It is unnecessary, therefore, to go over the ground covered by the opinion in the Whalen case, as we have nothing material to add to what is there…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Postal Tel. Cable Co. of Utah v. Oregon S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Lindemann v. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API