In re Aronson
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Casper A. Aronson. Petitions by the Boston Traveling Goods Company and others to reclaim from the receiver goods which petitioners contended were their own property. The referee denied the petitions, and petitioners appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
[1] These are three petitions brought by independent petitioners to' reclaim from a receiver in bankruptcy certain goods which the several petitioners contend were their property. The learned referee heard all the petitions together. His course in so doing was objected to by the petitioner Simon; but it seems to me to have been right, and certainly it was within the referee’s discretion. In the certificate the different claims are carefully separated and distinguished, and Simon’s rights were in no way prejudiced by what was done. This action of the referee is affirmed.
[…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Flanders Motor Co. v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1915
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Renfro-WadensteinDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931
- Jordan v. Federal Trust Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924
- Healey v. Boston Batavia Rubber Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920