Legal Opinion
In re Renfro-Wadenstein
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 5, 1931No. 9085PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The legal issue involved is: Was the merchandise, cash,* or accounts in bankrupt’s possession after adjudication held as on consignment as to either or both petitioners?
The state insolvency laws are not controlling, in view of subdivision (15), § 1, Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 1(15):
“A person shall be deeded insolvent within the provisions of this title whenever the aggregate of his property, exclusive of any property which he may have conveyed, transferred, concealed, or removed, or permitted to be concealed or removed, with intent to defraud, hinder, or…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Sellers v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- W. J. Earhart v. Alfred J. Callan, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Felix Ivan Pugh, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Salem v. Lawrence Lynch Corp. (In Re Farrell & Howard Auctioneers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Edgewood Shoe Factories, Division of General Shoe Corp. v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Sprehe v. Plazagal International Corp. (In re Plazagal International Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1983