Legal Opinion

Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 8, 1911No. 194PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Laeombe, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Bill by Clifford J. Ludvigh, trustee, against the American Woolen Company of New York and the Niagara Woolen Company. Decree (176 Fed: 145) for complainant and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

November 15, 1901, P. Horowitz & Co. entered into a- written contract with the American Woolen Company, to run to December 1, 1902, whereby the Woolen Company agreed to consign goods to Horowitz & Co., the title to the goods or their proceeds to remain in the Woolen Company until fully accounted for, all bills for the consigned goods to be made payable to the Woolen Company, and Horowitz & Co. to receive as their compensation the difference between the invoice and selling prices (which were not to be less than the invoice) and to be allowed a drawing account of $1,200 a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re GarcewichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. FramCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. Flanders Motor Co. v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1915
  3. In Re United States Electrical Supply Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1924
  4. McElwain-Barton Shoe Co. v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  5. In re AronsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API