Legal Opinion
Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 10, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-1924(PLF)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In its complaint, plaintiff Purdue Research Foundation (“PRF”) alleges that Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A. (“SSBO France”) breached contracts with plaintiff by failing to make payments in connection with Cooperative Research Agreements between plaintiff and defendant’s predecessors-in-interest. Plaintiffs complaint asserts that the Court has personal jurisdiction over defendant under the federal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- GTE New Media Services, Inc. v. Ameritech Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Novak-Canzeri v. SaudDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clay v. Blue Hackle North America, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- MINEBEA CO., LTD. v. PapstDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Duarte v. NolanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund v. Ipsen Pharma, S.A.S.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Parisi v. SinclairDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.