Legal Opinion

MINEBEA CO., LTD. v. Papst

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 29, 2005No. CIV.A.97-0590 PLFPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ objections to the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation No. 31, recommending that German law govern Counts IV (breach of fiduciary duty) and V (conversion), and that New York Law govern any punitive damages for Counts II (fraudulent concealment) and III (negligent misrepresentation). 1 Upon consid eration of the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation, the parties’ objections, and the responses thereto, the Court concludes that (1) the Special Master correctly concluded that German law…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Krock v. LipsayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Theodore R. Bledsoe, M.D. v. Brian Crowley, M.D. v. Sylvia Friedman, M.DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Base One Technologies, Inc. v. AliDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Sandza v. Barclays Bank PLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. In Re Commercial Money Center, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API