Legal Opinion

Ekwall v. Los Angeles Hat Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1930No. Docket No. 6972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. The cause was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in the sum of $18,000. From the judgment on the verdict the defendants appeal upon typewritten transcripts.

The complaint alleged that the injuries were due to the negligence of the defendant Marks, who was at the time of the collision a salesman in the employ of the Los Angeles Hat Company. An answer was filed, verified by the defendant Marks, in which this allegation was not denied. On the morning of the trial the defendants, having procured new…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donat v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Swartz v. Acme Express & Drayage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Clark v. FotheringhamWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Williams v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. GriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Betschart v. SteelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API