Legal Opinion
Clark v. Fotheringham
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1918No. 14233PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered February 17, 1917, upon findings in favor of the defendant, dismissing an action for damages sustained through an automobile collision, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This case was tried to the court without a jury. The court made findings as follows:
“(2) That, on September 13, 1916, plaintiffs were in their automobile proceeding west on Sprague avenue in the city of Spokane, Washington; that, when they came to the intersection of Sherman street with Sprague avenue, plaintiff B. A. Clark signalled by *13holding ont his arm, that he intended to turn south at said intersection.
“(3) That at the time said plaintiff B. A. Clark signalled for the turn and started said turn, defendant’s automobile was within half block coming.east on the south side of Sprague…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Donat v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Beebe v. AllisonWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- O. K. Theater Corp. v. RehmeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Peel v. California Belting Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Ekwall v. Los Angeles Hat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.