Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Coastal Mart, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 20, 2005No. 13-02-094-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceCastillo, Justice

I concur with the majority’s decision to remand. I write separately to explain the reasons I would affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

This is a contractual indemnity case. By four issues, appellants Coastal Mart, Inc. and Coastal Markets, Ltd., d/b/a Maverick Markets (collectively, “Coastal”) contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to appellee Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (“SWBT”). Coastal asserts: (1) SWBT is contractually obligated to indemnify Coastal in connection with a wrongful-death lawsuit that alleged Coastal and SWBT were negligent in the design,…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API